by Dr. Bart Billings of Carlsbad, CA
In his recent State of the Union Address, President Trump either purposely or accidentally used at least two psychological techniques to leave his opponents adrift, not knowing what to do next. One was the double-bind psychological technique, and the other, a catch-22 psychological technique.
The attending Democrats were so confused they yelled in vain to stop what was happening. The situation left the Democrats, who appeared more like Demoncrats, in a vulnerable position. On optics alone, the result was a degradation of their party platform.
The two strategies left the opposition feeling powerless, as explained below.
The double-bind technique is comprised of a communicative dilemma in which an individual receives or perceives two or more conflicting, contradictory messages, making it impossible to satisfy both, as fulfilling one violates the other. Proposed by Gregory Bateson, this “no-win” situation causes immense confusion, anxiety, and psychological paralysis and is often used to exert control in relationships.
The catch-22 technique is a paradoxical, inescapable situation in which the pursuit of a goal requires actions that make achieving it impossible, often leading to mental health struggles or behavioral traps. It is a circular “no-win” dilemma where the solution is embedded within the problem itself.
There were several times during the speech in which Trump’s opponents didn’t know when to stand and applaud or remain seated. The results included instances of inappropriate behavior that ignored common decency. At election time, Republicans will no doubt take advantage of the situation by creating videos of Democrats appearing confused and behaving inappropriately.
To add one final note, one could see clearly that many politicians were suffering from cognitive dissonance, something that was originally described by Leon Festinger in 1957. The theory states that individuals experience psychological discomfort (dissonance) when holding conflicting beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors.
In today’s political environment, people and politicians dismiss facts that challenge their political party. As a result, they accept and embrace “fake news” without question. In other words, they ignore facts and information that conflict with their existing beliefs. This tendency was clearly visible during the State of the Union address.
###
DR. BILLINGS’ CURRENT BOOK —

